REDBIO/FAO
Home
REDBIO
CATBIO
ProfREDBIO
Noticias
COORDINADORES
Encuentros Latinoamericanos
Redbio en Países
 



Co-operative activities in plant biotechnologies
Technical Co-operation Network on Plant Biotechnology (REDBIO)

CR E AT I O N AND CONSTITUTION O F THE NETWORK

During the planning meeting on Appropriate Biotechnology for Crop Production organized in Campinas, State of São Paulo, from 20 to 24 November 1989, by the FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, a recommendation was addressed to the FAO to examine the feasibility of setting up a technical co-operation network among plant-biotechnology laboratories. It was recommended that a programme be established for the development of plant biotechnologies including, inter alia, a directory of human resources, an inventory of plant-biotechnology laboratories and an analysis of trends in terms of priorities, crop species and technologies. The programme objective would be to define levels of excellence and provide reference services. The recommendation also sought to promote the dissemination of information, by way of a periodic circular letter, collection and publication of plant-biotechnology protocols, interconnection and access to data-banks and workshops in priority subjects.
In 1990, the FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean conducted a regional survey which included data on 173 laboratories in 17 countries. The private sector constituted 27% of the laboratories

surveyed. Analysis of the data revealed that human resources numbered 1,150 technicians, of whom 890 were post-graduates, there were 1,500 projects in operation, 560 publications and that 537 theses had been supervised over the past three years. The survey also revealed that equipment and infrastructure did not constitute the main weak points. These were to be found in the dearth of training in advanced plant biotechnologies, molecular biology, cell and tissue culture applied to genetic improvement of crop species, and methods for the diagnosis of food-crop diseases; a limited operating budget; and the vacuum caused by the lack of a technical co-operation network on information and research. A little more than 63% of the plant-biotechnology activities in the Region focused on tissue culture with the private sector support; 10.1% corresponded to projects on plant-disease diagnosis, while genetic engineering and functional genomic analysis represented the 8.6% and 2.7% respectively. The survey forecast an estimated growth in genetic engineering activities up to 22.6% and to 4.1% in genomic analysis (Izquierdo and de la Riva, 2000).

The participants in the Round Table for the Establishment of a Technical Co-operation Network among Plant Biotechnology Laboratories set about filling this void. Held at the FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, from 21 to 23 November 1990, the Round Table was attended by technicians and experts in plant biotechnologies from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela and the International Agricultural Research Centers (International Center for Tropical Agriculture, CIAT; International Potato Center, CIP; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, IPGRI), the Inter-American Institute for Co-operation on Agriculture and the Latin American Federation of Biotechnology Enterprise Associations (FELAEB). It agreed to set up a Technical Co-operation Network on Plant Biotechnology (Red de Cooperación Técnica en Biotecnología Vegetal, REDBIO).

The REDBIO was officially set up under the sponsorship of the FAO and with the co-operation of the International Agricultural Research Centers active in the region. It began operations in January 1991. Following a resolution by the FAO Regional Conference held in Uruguay in 1992, the REDBIO was expected to cover animal biotechnologies as well (Commandeur, 1994).

The Regional Co-ordination Committee was made up of the subregional co-ordinators elected by the REDBIO members every three years. The Committee members were responsible for preparing and promoting the Network and its activities, and for co-operating in the execution of proposed actions. A Technical Advisory Council comprised renowned researchers from the region in genetic engineering,germplasm, micropropagation, cell and tissue culture, diagnosis of plant pathogens, regulations and policies. It was in charge of setting priorities and policies, and promoting fund raising. The technical secretariat of REDBIO was administered by the Regional Plant Production Officer of the FAO Regional Office, Santiago de Chile.

In 1997, another survey by the REDBIO revealed that tissue culture maintained its predominance with 51.7% of plant-biotechnology activities due to its applications in agriculture. An interesting finding was the increase in research projects on genome analysis, although not with the same sophistication in all laboratories. This increase responded to the need to complement plant-breeding projects with the use of molecular markers and to the poor results obtained with somaclonal variation. The expansion of genetic engineering expected in 1990 did not take place; in fact the activities in genetic engineering fell from 8.6% in 1990 to 6.4% in 1997. Other activities such as the production of bio-insecticides and inoculants increased. These activities could be applied to the agricultural sector and bring short-term benefits. Was also increased the number of investigations on secondary metabolites of medicinal plants and their therapeutic use. These projects were promising, but they required an appropriate analytic base and infrastructure that should grow when the on-going projects reached superior stages, including the application of strict norms of quality control, registration and approval of products for pharmaceutical use (Izquierdo and de la Riva, 2000).

The range of plant species used in research-and-development projects changed over the period 1990–1997. In 1990, 29% of plant-biotechnology activities was directed toward fruit species, 28% to roots and tubers, and only 1.1% to ornamentals. In 1997, the fruit species represented 27% of the activities, roots and tubers fell to 14%, while ornamentals rose to 10% of plant-biotechnologies activities. Economic reasons explained these changes: propagation and tissue culture of fruit species and ornamentals was more profitable due to the high commercial value of the propagated plants; on the other hand, in food crops such as root and tuber plants, the price of the propagated plants should decrease in order to be affordable to small farmers (Izquierdo and de la Riva, 2000).

Another finding was the growing activity of transnational biotechnology companies that were introducing complete technological packages. The relations of these companies with national biotechnology groups should contribute to scientific development in the Region.

When consulting the 30 scientific publications with the greatest relevance in biotechnology, Izquierdo and de la Riva (2000) found that only 2% of the published scientific articles were generated by the laboratories of the Region (data from Current Contents, 1997). These authors considered that numerous small research teams, located in universities or agricultural institutions, without appropriate relationship and/or integration, represented a high dispersion of facilities and qualified work force. This small research groups lacked the critical mass of technological equipment and trained human resources to initiate relevant projects that would attract public and private investment and have an important impact on crop production. However, 48% of the laboratories (data from REDBIO/FAO, 1999) were supported by private funding to produce disease-free plants via tissue culture, the overall annual supply reaching about 75 million plants.

On 21 October 1999, a meeting of the REDBIO subregional and national co-ordinators was held in Caracas at the headquarters of the National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICIT). The following subregional co-ordinators were present:

– Central America, Mexico and Latin Caribbean countries: María Elena Aguiar of the Tropical Agriculture Research and Training Center (CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica);

– Andean countries, Eva de García of the Central University of Caracas;

– Central Zone Brazil, Roberto Torres of the Federal University of Goiania (Goias State, Brazil);

– South Cone, Daniel Pagliano of the National Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Research (INIA, Montevideo, Uruguay), who was replaced by the national REDBIO co-ordinator of Chile.

National co-ordinators of Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela also attended the meeting and presented the REDBIO activities in their respective countries, as well as the participating laboratories at national level.

Since 1991, plant-biotechnology laboratories of the English-speaking Caribbean countries, as well as of Cuba and the Dominican Republic had been members of the REDBIO. The seminar and workshop on Biotechnology in the Caribbean was organized in the Dominican Republic from 13 to 15 October 1999 by the Center for Agriculture, Livestock and Forestry Development (Centro para el Desarrollo Agropecuario y Forestal, CEDAF) of the Dominican Republic, the Caribbean Council of Sciences and Technology (CCST) of Guyana and Caribbean Agriculture and Fisheries Programme (CAFP). The main objective of the seminar was to identify co-operation strategies, find a consensus on the creation of a network, or strengthening a pre-existing one, on the exchange of information and transfer of knowledge in agricultural and food biotechnologies. An overwhelming majority was in favour of strengthening the subregional Caribbean REDBIO and setting up a committee comprising seven countries (Barbados, Cuba, Grenada, Haiti, Jamaica, Dominican Republic, and Trinidad and Tobago), and the CEDAF, CAFP and CCST. A follow-up workshop was organized in Havana from 7 to 8 December 1999, with the participation of the REDBIO co-ordinators of Cuba, Dominican Republic and Venezuela, and representatives of the CEDAF and Trinidad and Tobago. The workshop prepared a programme for the year 2000 aimed at strengthening national groups in the 13 Caribbean countries and designing training activities. The co-ordinator of the Caribbean REDBIO was Stephen Williams of the Citrus Research and Education Institute, Belize. The FAO Subregional Office for the Caribbean, located in Bardados, was expected to provide technical assistance to the FAO Regional Office (Santiago de Chile) in order to follow up the activities of the Caribbean REDBIO.

The Regional Biotechnology Catalogue, published in 1990, provided information on 154 laboratories. In 1991, CATBIO 1.0, in diskette, increased the data to 204 registries. In August 1992, the REDBIO Secretariat contacted all researchers, chiefs and associates of the Net-work member laboratories. Approximately 1,400 letters accompanied by a simple questionnaire were sent out to twenty countries to learn more about the staff working in REDBIO laboratories. A staff evaluation was made on the basis of experience, academic degrees, period of work in the institutions and scientific merit of the five more significant publications of each of them. The catalogue of the surveyed laboratories participating in the REDBIO was updated in 1994: CATBIO 2.0 comprised more than 350 laboratories in the region, which could be used for the exchange of germplasm and other materials, selection of candidates for courses, project formulation, technical advice and commercial advertisement. Data from the English-speaking Caribbean countries were also included in CATBIO 2.0 (REDBIO Circular Letter, 8, June 1994, p. 4).

By early 2000, the REDBIO included more than 549 affiliated laboratories in 32 countries from Latin America and the Caribbean; 83% of the affiliated laboratories had less than 10 researchers and technical staff and only 72% of this total had a minimum of three post-graduate researchers (Izquierdo and de la Riva, 2000). In order to facilitate exchanges and foster REDBIO activities, a new category of associated laboratories had been established, e.g. institutions of developing countries (associated and observers) keen to develop agreements, projects and training activities with REDBIO member laboratories. The Joint FAO/IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) Laboratory in Seibersdorf, Austria, had been incorporated into the Network as an associated member.

In addition to the subregional co-ordinators, national co-ordinators were responsible for co-ordinating the REDBIO activities in their respective countries and ensuring the relations among the various institutions and laboratories participating in the national REDBIO network. They were also responsible for convening national seminars, workshops and symposia under the REDBIO sponsorship.

The project InfoREDBIO, discussed by the participants in the national meeting REDBIO/Venezuela, held in Caracas from 18 to 21 October 1999, aimed to: offer a service of electronic information and communication of high quality to the institutions and laboratories participating in the REDBIO; develop the technical, administrative and managerial capacities of the REDBIO members, promote the exchange of experience among these members and foster the co-operation between laboratories and working groups; and strengthen the REDBIO Foundation. Under the InfoREDBIO project, it was intended to create a focal point in each country, equipped with the necessary tools, so as to become the receptor of the specialized information.

In 1999, the technical secretary of REDBO (FAO Regional Office in Santiago de Chile) prepared and disseminated 32 electronic bulletins. The web page of REDBIO was completely updated and reshaped, the server of the web page being located at the FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, in Santiago de Chile. The web site had received 5,282 visits in 1999( http://www.redbio.org

Home Return to top

OB J E C T I V E S AND AC T I V I T I E S O F THE NETWORK

It was agreed that the Network activities would respect the priorities set out by national institutions, regional organizations and bilateral agreements. It was not considered appropriate to identify priority crop species for the whole region, while the possibility was underlined of establishing subnetworks at subregional level, based on essential crops for grouped countries.

The REDBIO objectives were to:

– play the role of a technical forum supporting the formulation of national and regional biotechnology policies; – facilitate the exchange of information and research results among the Network members;

– foster the exchange of germplasm and biological material, as well as access to new technologies for those Network members lacking these resources, through exchange and training;

– support regional initiatives and training opportunities in plant biotechnologies; biotechnologies with comparative advantages for solving specific problems were highlighted, e.g. tissue and organ culture, micropropagation and clonal multiplication of cultivars, conservation and evaluation of germplasm, molecular diagnosis of pathogens;

– promote the advancement and updating of knowledge through the participation of Network members in international symposia and congresses;

– enhance complementarity between research groups and those involved in the production and transfer of technology, with a view to designing assistance mechanisms for project identification and funding by the relevant financial institutions.

Another key role of the Network was to prepare projects linking member laboratories in multidisciplinary joint research with advanced institutions in developed countries. The REDBIO was focusing collaborative research activities on: crop breeding for biotic and abiotic stress-tolerance through genetic engineering, gene mapping and biotechnology-assisted selection; integrated pest management through disease diagnostics and biological control assisted by molecular biology techniques; and policy issues, intellectual property protection, biosafety regulation and socio-economic impact of biotechnologies.

From 10 to 13 December 1991, a workshop on the Code of Conduct in Plant Biotechnology was held in Santiago de Chile, attended by 32 specialists from governmental and non-governmental institutions of Argentina, Brazil, Chile Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela and the USA. The issues of major interest were identified as biosafety, intellectual property, farmers’ rights, socio-economic impact, appropriate biotechnologies and conservation of plant genetic resources. The REDBIO and the FAO Secretariat prepared the first draft of an International Code of Conduct on Biotechnologies dealing with biosafety, intellectual property rights and regulations in the region. Revised in 1992, the Code included sections stating objectives and definitions, chapters in connection with intellectual property and farmers’ rights; biosafety; and the impact of biotechnologies. The Code main function was to serve as a reference for individual countries setting up their own regulatory codes on intellectual property, biosafety, appropriate technology and mitigation of the possible negative impacts of biotechnologies.

Two publications prepared by specialist members of the Network, Biotecnología apropiada a las necesidades del pequeño y mediano productor agrícola de América Latina y del Caribe and Acceso a la biodiversidad y a la biotecnología: propiedad intelectual y derechos del obtentor y del agricultor, were presented to the workshop on the Code of Conduct in Plant Biotechnology, held in Santiago de Chile, in December 1991. They were published as REDBIO documents and distributed during 1992. At the FAO Twenty-Second Regional Conference for Latina America and the Caribbean, held in Montevideo from 28 September to 2 October 1992, the REDBIO presented a document entitled Present state and perspectives for utilization of modern biotechnologies in Latin America and the Caribbean. It was also proposed that a revised edition of the book be prepared by the CINVESTAV (Center for Research and Advanced Studies) and INIFAP (National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research), Mexico, including an addition entitled Introducción a la biología molecular y ingeniería genética de plantas. The idea was to develop a basic textbook for schools of agriculture, of biology and others in poorly-documented areas of applied plant molecular biology.

Documents on molecular virology, integrated pest management through advanced biotechnologies and a manual on tropical roots and tuber-tissue culture had been published. The REDBIO also published data on theses prepared since 1985 by academic institutions and plant-biotechnology centres.

In 1993, the REDBIO concluded an agreement with the editor of the Biotechnology and Development Monitor, published by the University of Amsterdam, for distributing this publication to all member laboratories of the Network.

The European Commission also agreed that all REDBIO member laboratories could have access to the publication EBIS, which contained brief information on subjects of great relevance, such as biosafety, patenting and advanced biotechnologies in the member countries of the European Union (REDBIO Circular Letter, 6, June 1993, p. 8).

One of the Network most important activities was educating, qualifying and training staff, with emphasis on complementarity among research groups in biotechnologies. The REDBIO was organizing seminars, workshops and courses in disease diagnosis techniques; complementarity between conventional genetic improvement and molecular genetics; conservation and characterization of autochthonous plant genetic resources; in addition to germplasm exchange, the REDBIO was fostering the dissemination of information through newsletters and the preparation of documents on priority subjects.

A course on in-vitro plant-tissue culture and propagation of cultivated species, carried out at the Unit of Biotechnology, Agricultural Experimental Station ‘Las Brujas’, INIA (National Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Research), Uruguay, from 25 November to 6 December 1991, was attended by 20 participants from the REDBIO laboratories. Laboratory work focused on the micropropagation of potato, sweet potato, garlic, grapevine, fruit trees, strawberries and eucalyptus.

The subregional workshop on Supplementation of Biotechnological and Conventional Methods for Genetic Improvement of Food Crops, held at the INIA Agricultural Experimental Station ‘La Estanzuela, Uruguay, was sponsored by the REDBIO with the collaboration of the CIAT (International Center for Tropical Agriculture), CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) and IRRI (International Rice Research Institute). Ninety-two participants from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay attended this multidisciplinary workshop, whose purpose was to exchange experiences and biotechnologies; and to promote generation of an improved germplasm of the main food-crop species of the subregion, i.e. potato, rice, maize, wheat and barley. The workshop identified needs and emphasized opportunities for genetic improvement assisted by biotechnologies for the plant breeding programmes of the countries involved. In addition to the use of RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) and RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) markers, molecular probes, the identification of useful genes, obtention of transgenic plants and selection of improved genotypes with ample resistance to the main pests and diseases and environmental constraints were identified as priority research areas (REDBIO Circular Letter, 7, November 1993, pp. 5–6).

A seminar was held at the Wheat Research Center (Centro de Pesquisas de Trigo, CNPT, EMBRAPA), Paso Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, from 3 to 4 December 1991. Participants from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay made presentations on wheat-production methodologies in the South Cone and spoke on molecular techniques, e.g. those used in characterizing specific resistance to Puccinia recondita tritici; molecular probes for disease diagnosis; biological control of pathogens; incorporation of genomic markers monitored through the PCR (polymerase chain reaction); use of haploids and somaclonal variation in wheat improvement. The seminar was organized by the Co-operative Programme for the Technological Agricultural Development of the South Cone (Programa Cooperativo para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Agropecuario del Cono Sur, PROCISUR)/IICA, under the co-auspices of the CENARGEN/ EMBRAPA and CIMMYT, which also participated.

In Ecuador, considering the country great potential for increasing its arable lands for export crops, and the subsequent demand for in-vitro plants, the Fundación Vitroplant (Quito), Proexant, the International Center for Scientific Co-operation Simón Bolívar of Venezuela (Centro Internacional de Cooperación Científica), Central University of Ecuador, Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Research (Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIAP), International Potato Center, Environment and Development Corporation (Corpo-ración Ambiente y Desarrollo, AMDE) and Bioveget SA laboratories joined efforts to organize a national course on tissue culture from 29 March to 1 April 1993. The objective was to discuss different aspects of setting up a tissue culture laboratory: efficiency and profitability; training in the preparation of culture media; micropropagation tech-niques for potato, cassava, mulberry, strawberry, orchids and ‘paja toquilla’ (a fibre plant species).

Held on 5 April 1993 in Quito, the Second Meeting of REDBIO/Ecuador was attended by 40 participants from the 14 member institutions of the REDBIO in Ecuador. Participants comprised agronomists, biologists, technicians and specialists in tissue culture from public and private institutions. During this meeting, the guidelines of plant-biotechnology research policies were presented by the National Council of Science and Technology and the relevant activities carried out by the Faculties of Agriculture were reviewed (REDBIO Circular Letter, 6, June 1993, pp. 2–3).

The First Brazilian Meeting on Plant Biotechnology, held from 12 to 17 December 1993 in Brasilia, was organized by the REDBIO/Brazil Co-ordination, with the support of the Banco do Brasil Foundation, EMBRAPA (Brazilian Enterprise for Agriculture and Livestock Research), UNESCO and FAO Regional Office. The purpose of the meeting was to consolidate the FAO Plant Biotechnology Network in Brazil and to foster the integration of those institutions and laboratories that were Network members in Brazil. It was attended by 407 technicians and experts from 90 laboratories, in addition to experts from Argentina, Belgium, Costa Rica, Cuba, France, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Switzerland, Uruguay and the USA. Thirty-nine lectures, three round tables and the presentation of 207 posters during the meeting reviewed on-going research work in plant biotechnologies in the different academic institutions, as well as their commercial application in Brazil: plant genetic engineering, plant-genome mapping, plant-tissue and cell culture, biotechnology of woody plants and Palmaceae, biotechnology of medicinal plants and production of secondary metabolites, patents, and biosafety issues concerning trials of transgenic plants and their release.

Participants in the symposium also reviewed the: research-and-development priorities in plant biotechnologies for meeting Brazilian needs in terms of foodstuffs, food additives and pharmaceutical production; legal aspects of biotechnology development in Brazil (patents, intellectual property rights, biosafety); and application of biotechnologies to the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources. During simultaneous workshops, project profiles were prepared on priority subjects for the development and application of plant biotechnologies to food-crop species production. Profiles were also prepared on collaborative research projects between Brazilian teams and similar groups in other Latin American countries, including the advanced training of researchers (REDBIO Circular Letter, 8, June 1994, pp. 3–4).

The First Meeting of REDBIO/Bolivia was organized by the Bolivian Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Technology ( Instituto Boliviano de Tecnología Agropecuaria, IBTA) in Cochabamba from 13 to 14 December 1993, in order to promote national biotechnology activities and consolidate REDBIO/Bolivia. The purpose of the meeting was to: provide the public with information on activities in plant biotechnologies and promote these; exchange experiences among professionals; and consolidate the agricultural, forestry and medical activities of REDBIO/Bolivia activities (REDBIO Circular Letter, 8, June 1994, p. 8).

The First Meeting of REDBIO/Chile was held in Santiago de Chile on 3 March 1994 at the Catholic University of Chile, with the participation of 48 researchers and specialists from 18 plant-biotechnology laboratories. The programme included the presentation of activities and projects carried out by different public, academic and private-sector institutions that were Network members. Proposals were made to encourage the circulation of information to and from laboratories; to integrate activities into those promoted by the National Biotechnology Committee; and to support meetings and congresses in plant biotechnologies (REDBIO Circular Letter, 8, June 1994, p. 6).

The First Meeting of REDBIO/Uruguay was held in March 1995 and attended by researchers and authorities of the Network member laboratories. The specific objectives of the event were to: present progress reports and results in national research on plant biotechnologies; establish a portfolio of projects agreed on by the participating institutions that offered potential for co-operative research; analyze the national and international status of plant biotechnologies and design guidelines for maximizing the contribution of biotechnologies to the country development (REDBIO Circular Letter, 9, October 1994, p. 8).

In Argentina, the REDBIO National Co-ordination organized the Second Argentine Symposium on Plant Biotechnology from 30 May to 2 June 1993. Held in Huerta Grande, Córdoba, the Symposium was attended by numerous representatives of the country plant-biotechnology institutions, as well as by lecturers in genetic engineering, molecular biology, secondary metabolites and transformation, biotechnology and sustainable agriculture, cell culture, in-vitro culture of plants and food-crop production. Also, in Argentina, a course on applications of the advanced biotechnologies to agriculture was held from 1 to 21 November 1993 at the Research Institute for Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI), Buenos Aires, under the aegis of the International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. Fifteen students, including six from Argentina, participated in the course (REDBIO Circular Letter, 6, June 1993, pp. 4–5).

The Fourth National Symposium on Plant Biotechnology REDBIO/Argentina-99 was held from 11 to 12 November 1999 in Buenos Aires. More than 150 researchers from public and private institutions, and students from several Argentine universities attended the symposium the objectives of which were to: present the most recent advances in plant biotechnologies at the national and international level; review, and exchange ideas on, the current projects; design new projects on priority subjects; and promote the constitution of a critical mass of REDBIO/Argentina with researchers belonging to various public institutions and the private sector. In addition to a key-note address by the FAO representative for Latin America and the Caribbean, technical secretary of the REDBIO, on the vision of FAO regarding biotechnologies applied to the improvement of food crops and eight lectures delivered by national and foreign researchers, about 100 posters were presented on plant-tissue culture and micropropagation, secondary metabolites, genetic transformation, molecular biology-assisted plant breeding, resistance to biotic and abiotic stress, bioremediation and public perception of plant biotechnologies.

Following the Symposium, a post-graduate course on ‘Plant biotechnologies. Physiological parameters’ was organized from 15 to 20 November 1999 in the premises of the Faculty of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences of the National University of La Plata and the Institute of Biotechnology of the National Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Technology (INTA, Castelar).

The Fourth National Symposium was an opportunity for the Argentine REDBIO co-ordinator (Alicia Diamante, Laboratory of Tissue Culture, INTA Bella Vista, Corrientes) to report on the number of laboratories participating in the REDBIO and their research topics. About 46% of these laboratories were located in the Province of Buenos Aires, 12% in that of Santa Fé, 10% in that of Mendoza, 6% in those of Tucumán and Córdoba each, 4% in those of Misiones, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, La Pampa, Río Negro, San Juan each, and 2% in those of Neuquén and Tierra de Fuego each. Micropropagation and plant-tissue culture were by far the major activities of almost 25 and 17 laboratories respectively; resistance to abiotic stress, genetic transformation and use of molecular markers came after with 8, 6 and 6 laboratories dedicating their research to these areas, respectively; finally, secondary metabolites, genetic engineering and resistance to biotic stress were the research areas of some 5, 3 and 2 laboratories. With respect to plant species, cereals, vegetables and fruit species were the subject of research of 35, 30 and 25 laboratories, followed by forest species (18 laboratories), oilseed and industrial species (15 laboratories), ornamentals (10), fodder species (5) and miscellaneous (4).

In addition, the exchanges among researchers coming from various provinces allowed: the choice of PhD. theses under the supervision of researchers from different universities (e.g. Tucumán and Corrientes); the design of projects to be carried out by interdisciplinary groups (e.g. Mar del Plata - Buenos Aires and Corrientes); the formulation of proposals on how to improve the communication and exchange among the laboratories of the REDBIO/Argentina. The technical secretary of CamBioTec (Canada-Latin America Biotechnology Initiative for Sustainable Development, see p. 165) addressed the participants on the dissemination through the REDBIO of a document on public perception of biotechnologies via the involvement of public institutions such as the universities and INTA.

An assembly of the REDBIO/Argentina took place and the attendants were informed about the most recent stages regarding the creation of the REDBIO Foundation. The statutes of the latter were to be sent to all Network members in order to collect their comments. It was indeed foreseen to set up national subsidiaries of the Foundation, at least five (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Uruguay and Venezuela) before June 2001, when the Fourth Latin American Encounter on Plant Biotechnology was to be convened in the city of Goiania, Brazil. Each national REDBIO focal point was expected to review the Foundation statutes in order to check their relevance to the national legal norms. The Ministry of Education of Uruguay had been working on the issue of the legal status of the Foundation since October 1999.

At the Fourth National Symposium, the activities to be implemented under REDBIO/Argentina until 2001 were defined, and a number of courses were designed to be conducted in various regions of Argentina under the sponsorship of REDBIO. In addition, the mechanism for publishing the proceedings of the Symposium in the Electronic Journal of Biotechnology was finalized. The technical secretariat of the REDBIO provided a number of suggestions aimed at improving and updating the electronic linkages among the members of the REDBIO/Argentina.

The national meeting of REDBIO/Venezuela on The Status of Agricultural Biotechnology at a Footstep from the New Millenium (Balance de la Biotecnología Agrícola: a un Paso del Nuevo Milenio) was held from 18 to 21 October 1999 in the Foundation CELARG in Caracas. The main objectives of the meeting were to: take stock of the exchange of experience and research results among the national laboratoires participating in the REDBIO; present the results of the projects funded by the Inter-American Development Bank; and analyze the various options and strategies concerning the exchange of inform-ation in plant biotechnologies among Latin American countries. More than 90 participants attended the meeting and represented universities as well as the private sector. The technical topics of the meeting included: the molecular diagnosis of plant diseases; new trends in the resistance to viruses; forest species and biotechnology; commerciali-zation of transgenic crops and products; biological control; experiences in micropropagation; biosafety, biological diversity and regulation; information systems in biotechnologies (SIMBIOSIS 1(see p. 139) , InfoREDBIO), electronic biotechnology journals. In addition to reviewing co-operation opportunities among the REDBIO members, the FAO representative for Latin America and the Carribean (Santiago de Chile) and technical secretary of the REDBIO, presented the statement of the FAO on ‘The role of biotechnology in the genetic improvement of food crops: prospects for the next millenium’.

According to FAO, biotechnology provides powerful tools for the sustainable development of agriculture, fisheries and forestry, as well as the food industry. When appropriately integrated with other technologies for the production of food, other agricultural products and services, biotechnology offers significant potential for assisting in meeting the needs of an expanding and increasingly urbanized population in the next millennium. There is a wide array of ‘biotechnologies’ with different techniques and applications. The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) defines biotechnology as ‘any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use’. Interpreted in this broad sense, the definition covers many of the tools and techniques that are commonplace in agriculture and food production. Interpreted in a narrow sense, to consider only the new DNA techniques, molecular biology and reproductive technological applications, the definition covers a range of different technologies such as gene manipulation and gene transfer, DNA typing and cloning of plants and animals.

While there is little controversy about many aspects of bio-technology and its application, genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) have become the target of a very intensive and at times emotionally charged debate. The FAO recognizes that genetic engineering has potential for helping to increase production and productivity in agriculture, forestry and fisheries. It could lead to higher yields on marginal lands in countries that today cannot grow enough food to feed their people. Already there are examples of genetic engineering helping to reduce the transmission of human and animal diseases through new vaccines. Rice has been genetically engineered to contain provitamin A (beta-carotene) and iron, with the potential to improve the health of many low-income communities.

Other biotechnological methods have led to organisms that improve food quality and consistency, and other organisms, which clean up oil spills and heavy metals in fragile ecosystems. Tissue culture has produced plants that are increasing crop yields by providing farmers with healthier planting material. Marker-assisted selection and DNA fingerprinting allow a faster and much more targeted development of improved genotypes for all living species. They also provide new research methods assisting in the conservation and characterization of biodiversity. The new techniques will enable scientists to recognize and target quantitative trait loci and thus increase the efficiency of breeding for some traditionally intractable agronomic problems such as drought resistance and improved root systems.

However, the FAO is also aware of the concern about potential risks posed by some aspects of biotechnology. These risks fall into two basic categories: the effects on human and animal health, and the environmental consequences. Caution must be exercised in order to reduce the risk of transferring toxins from one life form to another, of creating new toxins or of transferring allergenic compounds from one species to another, that could result in unexpected allergic reactions. Risks to the environment include, among other things, the possibility of out-crossing, leading, for example, to the development of more aggressive weeds or wild relatives with increased resistance to diseases or environmental stresses, upsetting the ecosystem balance. There is also the potential loss of biodiversity, for example, resulting from the displacement of traditional cultivars by a small number of genetically-modified cultivars.

The FAO supports a science-based evaluation system that would objectively determine the benefits and risks of each individual GMO. This calls for a cautious case-by-case approach to address legitimate concerns for the biosafety of each product or process prior to its release. This includes evaluating the possible effects on biodiversity, the environment and food safety, and assessing the extent to which the benefits of the product or process outweigh its risks. The evaluation process should take into consideration experience gained by national regulatory authorities in clearing such products. Careful monitoring of the post-release effects caused by these products and processes is also essential to ensure their continued safety to human beings, animals and the environment.

Current investment in biotechnological research tends to be concentrated in the private sector and oriented towards agriculture in higher-income countries where the purchasing power exists for its products. In view of the potential which biotechnologies offer for helping to increase food supply and contributing to overcoming food insecurity and vulnerability, the FAO considers that efforts should be made to ensure that developing countries in general and resource-poor farmers in particular, benefit more from biotechnological research, while continuing to have access to a diversity of sources of genetic material. The FAO proposes that this need be addressed through increased public funding and dialogue between the public and private sectors 2(see pp. 139–40) .

Within the FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, a permanent intergovernmental forum, countries are developing a Code of Conduct on Biotechnology aiming to maximize the possible benefits of modern biotechnologies, and minimize the possible risks. The Code will be based on scientific considerations and will take into account the environmental, socio-economic and ethical implications of biotechnology. As in applications in medicine, these ethical aspects warrant responsible consideration. Therefore the Organization is working toward the establishment of an international expert committee on ethics in food and agriculture.

A seminar on Harmonization of Biosafety in the Americas: Building Institutional Capacities, was held from 7 to 10 June 1994 in Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. The basis for a Common Standard on Guarantee of Biosafety in the Andean Group was elaborated. In addition, the creation of a Monitoring System of Biosafety in Latin America and the Caribbean was recommended. Together with the Biosafety Information Network and Advisory Service (BINAS) of the UNIDO and IICA, the Monitoring System was expected to compile and disseminate inform-ation on regulations, norms and legislation to do with national biosafety, field trials and the commercialization of genetically-modified organisms (REDBIO Circular Letter, 9, October 1994, p. 10).

An international symposium on Biotechnology for Crop Im-provement in Latin America (BIOCILA) was held in Caracas from 1 to 7 November 1992. For the first time in Latin America, 179 scientists working in several areas of plant biotechnologies were brought together. They came mainly from Latin America (87%), while invited speakers came from Europe (9% of invited speakers) and from the USA (46% of invited speakers). The scientific programme was divided into five areas: crop transformation and regeneration; crop-quality improvement; nitrogen fixation; biotic stress; and abiotic stress. The Symposium also covered the following topics: genetic resources, status of plant biotechnologies and their co-ordination; genes and intellectual property of plant genetic resources; and biosafety issues in Latin America. A survey was carried out to score the impact of the Symposium. The level of the scientific programme was rated as very good; keynote presentations were rated as outstanding. The participants appreciated the efforts made to have good research presentations. Round-table discussions on genetic resources of the New World and the status of Latin American biotechnologies were greatly acknowledged. The prospects for application of the work exposed at BIOCILA in the participants’ institutions were considered very good. A Latin American Society for Plant Biotechnology was proposed to ensure the longevity of the BIOCILA symposium.

The Symposium was the First Latin-American Encounter on Plant Biotechnology. In fact, BIOCILA was proposed to become a permanent forum for Latin American plant biotechnologists, a symposium being organized every two or three years. The REDBIO welcomed this initiative and proposed that the following symposium be held under the REDBIO auspices in 1995.

Argentina was selected as the host country for the Second Latin American Encounter on Plant Biotechnology, christened REDBIO’95, which was held in Puerto Iguazú from 4 to 9 June 1995 in order to:

– review and disseminate new biotechnological knowledge for improving agricultural production in Latin America and the Caribbean;

– present the results of projects and promote both projects and policies supporting the development of plant biotechnologies;

– foster contact between young researchers or students from the region and renowned specialists from universities and centres of excellence world-wide;

– promote interaction between academia and the production sector; – discuss the socio-economic and environmental impact of advanced biotechnologies in the region.

REDBIO’95 included symposia on: micropropagation and cell biotechnologies for genetic improvement; cell and molecular biology advances; resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses; biological control; primary and secondary metabolism; field trials of transgenic plants; priorities in agricultural biotechnologies in Latin America and the Caribbean; socio-economic impact; interaction between academia and the production sector; co-operation policies with the USA, Europe and Japan. In addition, workshops were organized to deal specifically with cereal, legume, root and tuber, vegetable and ornamental, fodder, industrial, fruit and forest crop species.

REDBIO’95 was sponsored by the FAO, UNESCO, UNDP, OEA Multinational Project for Biotechnology and Food Technology, IICA, Argentine Secretariat for Science and Technology (SECYT), National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET) and National Institute for Agriculture and Livestock Technology (INTA).

The Third Latin American Encounter on Plant Biotechnology was held in Havana from 1 to 5 June 1998 and sponsored by the FAO and UNESCO. In addition to Latin American and Caribbean participants, researchers from Canada, France, Italy, Spain and the USA attended he encounter. Eleven plenary lectures were delivered and eight symposia were held on the following subjects: advances and prospects in the classification and diagnosis of phytopathogens; advanced bio-technologies for the conservation of plant genetic resources; molecular markers in the genetic improvement of crops and apomixis; biotechnology of biological control agents; resistance to abiotic stress; resistance to biotic stress; current trends in plant micropropagation; primary and secondary metabolites. Workshops were also organized on: biotechnology applied to the control of the complex white fly and geminiviruses; biotechnologies applied to the cultivation of banana and plantain; use of molecular markers in the genetic improvement of crops; use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant germplasm; biotechnologies applied to the cultivation of potato, sugar-cane, forest species and cassava; biological control agents; biotechnologies applied to the diagnosis of diseases in citrus and other fruit species.

The latter workshop was organized upon the request of the Inter-American Citrus Network (RIAC, Red Interamericana de Citrus), as one of the main activities of the Project aimed at controlling the diseases which were threatening citrus plantations throughout the Americas. The representative of Spain commented that the European Union accepted citrus fruits imported from Tucumán, Argentina, while the representative of the USA indicated that some US States accepted citrus fruits from Argentina. In contrast, the representative of Uruguay stated that the USA did not accept citrus fruits originating from Argentina and Uruguay. It was also mentioned that in September 1998 a meeting held in Spain aimed to regulate the import by the European Union of citrus fruits affected by canker. The workshop ended with the drafting of diagnostic methods to be used in the certification of citrus species with regard to the following diseases: canker, viroids, psorosis, tristeza and concave-gum.

A workshop was also organized on the preparation of scientific papers to be published in high-level plant-biotechnology journals. Over 700 posters were presented during the Third Latin American Encounter.

On this occasion, a meeting of the REDBIO subregional and national co-ordinators was held to review the statutes of the REDBIO Foundation. This was a civic association, having a 13-member executive board and considered as a necessary tool for supporting the REDBIO objectives. The Foundation aimed to promote national and regional policies for the development of biotechnologies, as well as research-and-development projects carried out jointly by institutes, laboratories and enterprises. The Foundation was expected to support these projects and to emphasize the training of human resources, exchange of knowledge, technology and biological material. A mission was undertaken in 1999 to Washington, D.C., to hold working sessions with staff members of the World Bank and Inter-American Development Bank on the funding of a first portfolio of research-and-development projects. The Banks were supportive of the Foundation and of funding projects which were to be carried out by two countries or more, members of the REDBIO, and aimed to solve priority problems in these countries.

Another project discussed during the Third Latin American Encounter concerned the creation of a post-graduate school in biotechnology in Latin America and the Caribbean. This project was being designed by A. Mentaberry of the Research Institute for Genetic Engineering and Molecular Biology (INGEBI) of the National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET) of Argentina. The rationale fo the project was to train highly-qualified specialists but in close relation with local needs, because most of those who were trained abroad worked on subjects irrelevant to these needs.

A strategy was also presented to associate the REDBIO with the Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. It was agreed that all the works and posters submitted to the encounter would be published in the Journal; the suggestion was even made that negotiations be carried out to enable Latin American researchers to publish the results of their work via the Journal. Such publication would not entail extra-cost because the Journal was subsidized by company advertisements.

The Fourth Latin American Encounter on Plant Biotechnology (REDBIO-2001) was to be held from 4 to 8 June 2001 in the city of Goiania, Goias State, Brazil, under the aegis of REDBIO/Brazil, the REDBIO Foundation and several Brazilian institutions.

Without being sponsored by the REDBIO, but as a related activity, the International Symposium on Plant Genetic Engineering: Towards the Third Millenium was organized by the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) in Havana from 6 to 10 December 1999. The attendance comprised 52 invited speakers and delegates from 30 countries, as well as representatives of three international organizations (including the FAO and UNESCO). The sponsors of the Symposium were the State Council of the Republic of Cuba, Ministries of Science, Technology and Environment, of Agriculture, of Sugar, Montedison Group, Rhône-Poulenc Biotech and the National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock Research (INIFAP) of Mexico. Professor M. Van Montagu, Director of the Department of Genetics of the University of Gent, Belgium, was elected honorary chairman of the Symposium, as a tribute to his outstanding contribution to the development of plant biotechnologies and to the training of a great number of plant biotechnologists in the developing world. The programme of the Symposium included the following topics: socio-economic impact of biotechnology; plant genome; crop transformation; abiotic and biotic stress; quality of plant products; molecular farming; biosafety and ethical considerations. The Symposium enabled the Cuban researchers to present their results in massive micropropagation and clonal multiplication of sugar-cane, banana, plantain, sweet potato, Xanthosoma, citrus and ornamentals; biofertilizers and biopesticides; gene mapping and use of molecular markers.

Albert Sasson

Home Return to top